These are cases brought to court under the ADA/504 Titles I, II,
and III. It inludes Supreme Court decisions.
Links
| Guckenberger v Boston University |
|
Guckenberger v Boston University (Course
substitution)
|
|
| Bartlett v Law Examiners |
|
Test Accommodations
|
|
| Huezo v LACCD |
|
Marvin HUEZO, v.LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
(Re: Los Angeles Pierce College) (Facility access & barrier
removal)
|
|
| Southeastern v Davis |
|
Southeastern Community College v. Davis (Physical qualifications
for admission to clinical training programs).
|
|
| Wong v Regents of University of California |
|
Wong v. Regents of the University of California (LD
Accommodations in Medical School)
|
|
| ADA Title III DOJ V NBME |
|
SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA AND
NATIONAL BOARD OF MEDICAL EXAMINERS
|
|
| Bonnette v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, Dist. Court, Dist. of Columbia 2011 |
|
Use of computer equipped with an accessible screen-reading
program called JAWS (which stands for Job Access With Speech) that
is commonly used by individuals with visual impairments to access
Multistate Bar Exam.
|
|
| Enyart v. National Conference of Bar Examiners, 630 F. 3d 1153 - Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit 2011 |
|
Multistate Professional Responsibility Exam and the Multistate
Bar Exam using a computer equipped with assistive technology
software known as JAWS and ZoomText.
|
|
| Turner v. Association of American Medical Colleges, 167 Cal. App. 4th 1401 - Cal: Court of Appeals |
|
AAMC argues that neither the Unruh Civil Rights Act nor the DPA
require it to provide testing accommodations to disabled
individuals taking a standardized test such as the MCAT
|
|
| Turner v. Association of American Medical Colleges, 193 Cal. App. 4th 1047 - Cal: Court of Appeals, 1st Appellate Dist., 5th Div. 2011 |
|
In
Turner v. Association of American Medical Colleges (2008)
167 Cal.App.4th 1401 [85 Cal.Rptr.3d 94] (Turner I),
this court held that, when taking a standardized test, individuals
with learning disabilities and other conditions affecting their
ability to read are not entitled to accommodations under
California's Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civ. Code, § 51)[1] and Disabled
Persons Act (DPA) (§ 54 et seq.). We reversed the trial court's
decision in favor of plaintiffs.
|
|
| VETERANS FOR COMMON SENSE v. Nicholson, Dist. Court, ND California 2008 |
|
Plaintiffs are non-profit organizations that represent the
interests of veterans of the Iraq, Afghanistan and earlier
conflicts who have sought medical treatment or filed disability
claims based on Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder ("PTSD").
|
|